All problem statements
SIH26253HardwareClean & Green Technology

Development of Strip-Based Water Quality Test Kits for Assessment of Free Residual Chlorine (FRC) with Sensitivity up to 0.1 ppm for Field-Level Applications

Ministry of Jal Shakti (MoJS)

Ideas submitted
—
Deadline
5 October 2026
Category
Hardware
Theme
Clean & Green Technology

Looks like it needs

Mobile (Flutter / Android)

Background & Description: Free Residual Chlorine (FRC) is a critical indicator for ensuring the microbiological safety of drinking water in supply systems. Routine monitoring of FRC is essential to verify the effectiveness of disinfection processes and to prevent the distribution of unsafe water to consumers. Further, many commercially available kits use o-toluidine (OT) as a reagent, which has been banned by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) due to environmental concerns, while alternative reagents such as N, N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine (DPD), though safer, are relatively expensive. These limitations highlight the need for a cost-effective, user-friendly,and reagent-free or low-reagent portable solution for reliable FRC monitoring in field conditions. There is a need for a simple, accurate, and low-cost strip-based test kit capable of measuring FRC concentrations with a sensitivity of up to 0.1 ppm. The solution should provide rapid and easy-to-interpret results and be suitable for use by village-level workers, community volunteers, and water supply functionaries. The proposed solution should: Accurately measure FRC up to 0.1 ppm sensitivity. Provide quick and easy field-based testing. Be affordable and suitable for large-scale deployment. Require minimal training and no specialized equipment. Support digital recording and reporting of results.

Expected Outcomes

1. Development of indigenous, strip-based Free Residual Chlorine (FRC) test kits with high sensitivity and accuracy. 2. Strengthening of field-level monitoring mechanisms for effective chlorination in drinking water systems. 3. The detection range of the test kits should be aligned with prescribed drinking water quality standards (BIS 10500). 4. Promotion of enhanced community participation in water quality surveillance and monitoring. 5. Provision of a cost-effective and scalable solution for routine water quality monitoring in rural areas.

How contested this one is

as of 1 Oct
0ideas submitted

Nobody has submitted an idea against this one yet. 13 of the 258 statements are still on zero, so an empty count this early says the field has not arrived, not that the statement is bad.

Added mid-season. This statement first appeared on 1 October, after the original list went out. Teams who shortlisted early have most likely never seen it.

See what the whole field is picking →

Counted from the official portal twice a day. The portal itself only shows today.

What a jury will ask about this

  1. 01“Who actually faces this problem today?”

    What works: Naming one real person and what they do instead right now. Reading the statement back is not an answer, they already read it.

  2. 02“This already exists. Why yours?”

    What works: That existing tools are consumer products. Yours is built for the ministry, works offline, in the local language, on official data.

  3. 03“Then why has nobody solved it yet?”

    What works: The real blocker. No connectivity, no incentive, nobody owns the data. You only know this if you read the ministry's own reports.

All 18 questions, with the trap answers →

More in Clean & Green Technology

See all →