All problem statements
SIH26159SoftwareBlockchain & Cybersecurity

SecureMailScope: AI-Assisted Cryptographic Security Posture Assessment for Secure Email Communications

National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO)

Ideas submitted
50 / 500
Deadline
30 September 2026
Category
Software
Theme
Blockchain & Cybersecurity

Looks like it needs

AI / MLBlockchainCybersecurity

• Background Electronic mail remains one of the most critical communication services for governments, enterprises, financial institutions, and academic organizations. Despite the widespread adoption of Transport Layer Security (TLS), many SMTP, IMAP, and POP3 deployments continue to suffer from cryptographic misconfigurations such as obsolete TLS versions, weak cipher suites, insecure STARTTLS implementations, expired or improperly configured certificates, and non-compliance with modern security standards. These weaknesses expose email infrastructures to downgrade attacks, man-in-the-middle attacks, passive interception, and other cryptographic threats.

Although existing network analysis tools provide extensive packet-level visibility, they primarily focus on protocol decoding and traffic inspection. They do not automatically evaluate the overall cryptographic security posture of email communications or provide intelligent risk assessment and prioritization for security analysts.

• Description Design and develop an AI-assisted passive network forensic framework capable of analyzing captured network traffic (PCAP files) containing SMTP, IMAP, and POP3 communications to automatically assess the cryptographic security posture of enterprise email infrastructures.

The proposed solution shall reconstruct complete email communication sessions, identify encryption transitions, analyze TLS negotiations, validate digital certificates, detect cryptographic weaknesses, and leverage Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning techniques to classify security risks, detect anomalous TLS behavior, and generate actionable security recommendations.

The framework should assist Security Operations Centers (SOC), Digital Forensics teams, Incident Response teams, and enterprise administrators in rapidly identifying cryptographic vulnerabilities, prioritizing remediation efforts, and ensuring compliance with modern cryptographic best practices.

• Objectives- The proposed system should be capable of: • Passive analysis of encrypted SMTP, IMAP, and POP3 traffic from PCAP files. • Automatic identification of application-layer email protocols. • Detection of STARTTLS negotiation and encrypted session upgrades. • Reconstruction of complete TCP communication streams. • Parsing and reconstruction of TLS handshakes. • Extraction and validation of X.509 digital certificates. • Identification of negotiated TLS versions, cipher suites, and key exchange mechanisms. • Detection of deprecated protocols, weak cipher suites, insecure cryptographic algorithms, and certificate-related vulnerabilities. • Extraction of cryptographic features for intelligent analysis. • Application of AI/ML techniques for: • Cryptographic risk classification. • Detection of anomalous TLS behavior. • Security posture scoring. • Threat prioritization. • Recommendation of mitigation measures. • Generation of comprehensive forensic reports and security dashboards.

Expected Solution/Deliverables

The solution should provide the following outputs

• Automatic identification of SMTP, IMAP, and POP3 protocols. • STARTTLS negotiation detection and validation. • Complete TCP stream reconstruction. • TLS handshake reconstruction. • Detection of negotiated TLS versions. • Identification of negotiated cipher suites. • Identification of key exchange mechanisms. • Extraction of X.509 certificates. • Certificate chain validation. • Certificate expiration analysis. • Public key algorithm and key length analysis. • Digital signature algorithm identification. • Detection of weak cryptographic algorithms and deprecated TLS versions. • Identification of insecure protocol configurations. • Forward Secrecy assessment. • AI-based cryptographic risk scoring. • AI-assisted anomaly detection for suspicious TLS sessions. • Prioritized security findings. • Comprehensive cryptographic security posture assessment. • Exportable forensic reports in JSON, PDF, and HTML formats. • Interactive visualization dashboard for security monitoring and analysis.

How contested this one is

as of 28 Sept
50ideas submitted+15 in 2 days

That puts it 179th of the 240 statements that have any ideas at all, out of 240 on the board. It is moving, so the field here is already forming.

See what the whole field is picking →

Counted from the official portal twice a day. The portal itself only shows today.

What a jury will ask about this

  1. 01“Who actually faces this problem today?”

    What works: Naming one real person and what they do instead right now. Reading the statement back is not an answer, they already read it.

  2. 02“This already exists. Why yours?”

    What works: That existing tools are consumer products. Yours is built for the ministry, works offline, in the local language, on official data.

  3. 03“Then why has nobody solved it yet?”

    What works: The real blocker. No connectivity, no incentive, nobody owns the data. You only know this if you read the ministry's own reports.

All 18 questions, with the trap answers →

More in Blockchain & Cybersecurity

See all →