• Problem Description Training systems frequently capture enrolment, attendance, assessment and certification, but reliable information on employment, self-employment, job retention, wage progression, relevance of training and longer-term livelihood outcomes may remain incomplete.Trainees may change phone numbers or locations, employers may not report consistently, and multiple programmes may use different identifiers and definitions. Without longitudinal outcomes, it is difficult to compare providers, improve courses, target future investments or demonstrate public value. The challenge is to establish credible, low-burden and privacy conscious outcome tracking. • Expected Solution / Outcome A longitudinal skilling-outcomes and impact-measurement system that creates consent-based trainee records,links training with placement and employment signals, conducts automated and assisted follow-ups,captures self-employment and apprenticeship outcomes, validates employer information, measures wage and retention progression, and provides cohort, course, provider, district and demographic analytics. It should identify skill gaps and reasons for non-placement or attrition. Expected outcomes include higher-quality outcome data, better programme and provider accountability,targeted remedial actions, improved resource allocation and evidence-based policy design.
Difficulties in tracking employment outcomes,skill gaps, and the impact of skilling initiatives
Government Of Maharashtra
- Ideas submitted
- 157 / 500
- Deadline
- 30 September 2026
- Category
- Software
- Theme
- Miscellaneous
How contested this one is
as of 29 SeptThat puts it 82nd of the 240 statements that have any ideas at all, out of 240 on the board. It is moving, so the field here is already forming.
See what the whole field is picking →Counted from the official portal twice a day. The portal itself only shows today.
What a jury will ask about this
01“Who actually faces this problem today?”
What works: Naming one real person and what they do instead right now. Reading the statement back is not an answer, they already read it.
02“This already exists. Why yours?”
What works: That existing tools are consumer products. Yours is built for the ministry, works offline, in the local language, on official data.
03“Then why has nobody solved it yet?”
What works: The real blocker. No connectivity, no incentive, nobody owns the data. You only know this if you read the ministry's own reports.
More in Miscellaneous
See all →- SIH26034 · Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public DistributionSoftware System to check compliance of Packaged Commodities under Legal Metrology(Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 by scanning products, images and labels.
- SIH26035 · Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public DistributionDevelopment of a Software Program/Application for Generation of Test Reports for Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments (NAWI) as per OIML Recommendation R- 76
- SIH26036 · Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public DistributionDevelopment of an Online Verification System for Weighing and Measuring Instruments
- SIH26051 · DRDOSoftware Based Model Development for Design of Area Specific Shelter for Thermal Comfort Maintenance.
- SIH26052 · DRDOTo develop an AI/ML-enabled adaptive noise cancellation (ANC) system that effectively suppresses stationary, non-stationary, and impulsive defence noises while maintaining high speech intelligibility and real-time performance on embedded hardware.
- SIH26114 · AutodeskSmart City Site Planning using Autodesk Forma Site Design